A Clause-Based Heuristic for SAT Solvers

نویسندگان

  • Nachum Dershowitz
  • Ziyad Hanna
  • Alexander Nadel
چکیده

We propose a new decision heuristic for DPLL-based propositional SAT solvers. Its essence is that both the initial and the conflict clauses are arranged in a list and the next decision variable is chosen from the top -most unsatisfied clause. Various methods of initially organizing the list and moving the clauses within it are studied. Our approach is an extension of one used in Berkmin, and adopted by other modern solvers, according to which only conflict clauses are organized in a list, and a literal-scoring-based secondary heuristic is used when there are no more unsatisfied conflict clauses. Our approach, implemented in the 2004 version of zChaff solver and in a generic Chaff-based SAT solver, results in a significant performance boost on hard industrial benchmarks.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Improving SAT Solvers via Blocked Clause Decomposition

The decision variable selection policy used by the most competitive CDCL (Conflict-Driven Clause Learning) SAT solvers is either VSIDS (Variable State Independent Decaying Sum) or its variants such as exponential version EVSIDS. The common characteristic of VSIDS and its variants is to make use of statistical information in the solving process, but ignore structure information of the problem. F...

متن کامل

The Effect of Structural Branching on the Efficiency of Clause Learning SAT Solving

The techniques for making decisions, i.e., branching, play a central role in complete methods for solving structured instances of propositional satisfiability (SAT). Experimental case studies in specific problem domains have shown that in, some cases, SAT solvers benefit from structure-based limitations on which variables the solver is allowed to branch. Mainly, the focus has been on input (or ...

متن کامل

Improving Implementation of SLS Solvers for SAT and New Heuristics for k-SAT with Long Clauses

Stochastic Local Search (SLS) solvers are considered one of the best solving technique for randomly generated problems and more recently also have shown great promise for several types of hard combinatorial problems. Within this work, we provide a thorough analysis of different implementation variants of SLS solvers on random and on hard combinatorial problems. By analyzing existing SLS impleme...

متن کامل

Dissolve: A Distributed SAT Solver based on St̊almarck’s Method

Creating an effective parallel SAT solver is known to be a challenging task. At present, the most efficient implementations of parallel SAT solvers are portfolio solvers with some heuristics to share learnt clauses. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for solving SAT problems in parallel based on the combination of traditional CDCL with St̊almarck’s method. In particular, we use a variant...

متن کامل

Exponential Recency Weighted Average Branching Heuristic for SAT Solvers

Modern conflict-driven clause-learning SAT solvers routinely solve large real-world instances with millions of clauses and variables in them. Their success crucially depends on effective branching heuristics. In this paper, we propose a new branching heuristic inspired by the exponential recency weighted average algorithm used to solve the bandit problem. The branching heuristic, we call CHB, l...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005